
|
November 2007 • VOLUME 27 • © HORSES For LIFE™ Magazine
Competition in science and dressage, impossible marriages?
An essay by
H.G.Solari(*)
To physicists the news came as a shock: scientists at two important
laboratories (Lucent Technologies' Bell Laboratories and Lawrence Berkeley
National Lab. -
The Task Force organized by APS sent out a questionnaire to physicists
in the
Scientists in training said that:
The only real answer to the ethics problem is for tenure review boards
to stop rewarding the Science/Nature/PRL culture above all else (2)
Our scientific community promotes research of the surface and
superficiality [to the] detriment of content and depth.
Many breaches of ethics arise from the pressure to publish . . .
To understand how the findings in physics relate to dressage, let me put
forward a rough table of equivalences:
Translated
into dressage, the findings in physics would be: horses (and young riders?)
are saying
The only real answer to the ethics problem is for dressage associations
to stop rewarding the 'ribbons-and-show-above-all-else' culture.
Our dressage community promotes seeking mechanical exactness and
superficiality, to the detriment of beauty and harmony.
Many breaches of ethics arise from the pressure to win at shows.
The fact that the translation seems to work suggests the existence of a
deeper relationship, and a common phenomenon between the scientists and the
competitive dressage rider.
There is a striking similarity between the proclaimed values of the
scientist and the dressage rider.
The values correspond to big words no one would dare to
challenge (Truth, Correctness, Reason, Beauty, Harmony ...)
And yet… the precise meaning of them is difficult or impossible to
explain outside dogmatism. In part because the precise meaning is determined by
social elements. We learn to associate some objective attributes with
characteristics of each value. I will further sustain that the original meaning
has to be sought in the ancient Greeks and the relation to Nature, and was
recovered during the Renaissance.
Harmony, for example, would be related to
ease of movement, absence of tensions, and correspondence between the parts.
Truth would be a
result/theory/abstraction that finds (so far) no contradictory
results/observations and is in correspondence with natural observations.
However these quick definitions only translate the problem into
recognizing tension or recognizing contradiction.
For example, the FEI wants to celebrate the “happy horse”. We would all
agree that a rider that keeps his horse happy is to be congratulated. Yet I can
see that some of the teams earning “happy horse” awards don't have horses that
I would consider happy. Instead they correspond to rollkur-trained horses, with
horses displaying resignation and fear.
Later in this essay there is a 'happy horse' quiz, which I invite you to do, to check how much you know about horses (and people).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||